<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Constitution Wins One !!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservativecorner.magicvalleysites.com/2010/01/22/the-constitution-wins-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservativecorner.magicvalleysites.com/2010/01/22/the-constitution-wins-one/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 23:02:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CS</title>
		<link>http://conservativecorner.magicvalleysites.com/2010/01/22/the-constitution-wins-one/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>CS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativecorner.magicvalleysites.com/?p=86#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Tom,
If the left is allowed to refer to Tea Party folks as “teabaggers” then why aren&#039;t we allowed to refer to those fine liberals as “jackasses”? It’s only fair right?
(Edited to correct grammatical error)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
If the left is allowed to refer to Tea Party folks as “teabaggers” then why aren&#8217;t we allowed to refer to those fine liberals as “jackasses”? It’s only fair right?<br />
(Edited to correct grammatical error)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan lyon</title>
		<link>http://conservativecorner.magicvalleysites.com/2010/01/22/the-constitution-wins-one/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>dan lyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativecorner.magicvalleysites.com/?p=86#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom, good to see you again and a sweet blog to boot. I find it odd that a progressive Republican got the bill passed, and when it’s struck down, Dems go nuts. 

I see millions of dollars going directly to the commercial ad productions that no longer end up in a donation fund to a either party, boo hoo. 

I see the Dems complaining that the voter base is going to be tainted by floods of one sided political commercials that will sway their vote. I call BS on that because I think voters have slightly woke to investigating issues at hand instead of voting for the best campaign ad with a scorching smear line against the opponent. Those days are gone. 

People are becoming more educated on who is giving them the shaft and the freedom of speech will become more important than ever.

Dan Lyon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom, good to see you again and a sweet blog to boot. I find it odd that a progressive Republican got the bill passed, and when it’s struck down, Dems go nuts. </p>
<p>I see millions of dollars going directly to the commercial ad productions that no longer end up in a donation fund to a either party, boo hoo. </p>
<p>I see the Dems complaining that the voter base is going to be tainted by floods of one sided political commercials that will sway their vote. I call BS on that because I think voters have slightly woke to investigating issues at hand instead of voting for the best campaign ad with a scorching smear line against the opponent. Those days are gone. </p>
<p>People are becoming more educated on who is giving them the shaft and the freedom of speech will become more important than ever.</p>
<p>Dan Lyon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

