Now we have heard that many of the poorest nations on Earth have recently walked out of the Copenhagen Summit. The MSM will tell you the talks broke down due to the fact that “These poorer nations are simply refusing to cooperate.” More spoon fed garbage from the copy-n-paste news media.

If the news media actually did some reporting, rather than only writing stories that advance their globalist agenda (remember who owns most of the news organizations – extremely rich Liberals) you might actually find out the reason the poor countries are “refusing to cooperate.”

Follow the money trail with me:

What is the “goal” of Kyoto and Copenhagen? To lower emissions of C02 you might say? WRONG. It is to get all the countries of the world to put money into a huge bank account controlled by…you guessed it – The United Nations, The World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund. The “rich” countries are supposed to pledge billions of dollars to “help the world implement green technology”…or, in other words, create huge new taxing schemes to siphon-off money. Raise your hands…who thinks the U.N., World Bank, and IMF are reliable, honest administrators of international funds? Anyone…anyone…?

These International Treaties decide who pays what, how much, and when. For example, Sweden will say, “We would like to pledge $5 Million dollars.” Then all the Swedish politicians pat each other on the back, and head out to play golf and eat fancy cheeses, and praise each other for helping save the planet. Did they actually do or accomplish anything? Nope.

They also decide how much other countries MUST pledge…even poor countries who don’t add much C02. When these countries are unable to “pay their part of the accord”…the IMF then lends them money, at high interest rates, in order for them to pay. The term is “Climate Financing” and once the 3^rd World countries found out the large percentages they would be responsible for, they all walked out.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text

If these politicians truly believed that C02 was destroying the planet, would they be chartering private jets to fly around the world, driving limos, and catering these huge meetings? Would Algore’s house guzzle 20 times more energy than the average house?  Would hysterical Price Charles tell his countrymen to abandon their cars while he drives around a gas-guzzling Aston Martin?

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/146265/Prince-Charles-Executive-jet-with-big-carbon-footprint-gets-him-to-climate-change-talks

The fact is, 99.99% of these climate profiteers do not practice what they preach. It is simply a way to scare the uneducated into handing over money to those who would profit from these carbon trading schemes.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BD4D020091214?feedType=RSS&feedName=environmentNews&rpc=22&sp=true

I am all for “green” energy and “green” technology…as long as it can compete in the marketplace without adding taxation to an already over-taxed system. If you want to put up solar panels and windmills on your home or business – go for it. If you want to drive a Prius and eat organic foods – great…I am pro-Freedom. However, if you want to impose your “belief system” – in the form of additional taxation based on incomplete, modified, and “tricked” science – now we have a problem.

Watch this AP video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erZObhMMEgw&feature=player_embedded

Notice how they use the term “help” instead of loan…

Notice how they don’t differentiate between “pollution” and “climate change”…

Notice how they portray George Soros as just a nice guy trying to help the poor…

Notice how they show some icicles melting as a subliminal message…

This is another example of the MSM pushing their agenda rather than reporting news. It is so sophomoric in presentation and so obvious that this was simple propaganda, but unfortunately, I suspect most people would have simply digested it as “news” and went about their day…and that is the saddest part of all.

Please understand: I want clean air, clean water, and a healthy environment just as much as my Birkenstock clad, low-impact brothers. I just don’t feel that the science has conclusively proven that C02 causes extra heat to be trapped, it may be that the extra heat causes extra C02 to be stored: Scientists do not know. In fact, they have been proven to be manipulating the numbers to favor their desired results. The 1-2 degrees of temperature fluxuation is more likely caused by ocean temps or output from the Sun. In any event, allowing a few scientists and huxters like Algore to personally profit  off the backs of taxpayers is not an equitable result.

Many of you have read, from a variety of sources, how the AGW (man-caused) global warming scam is the product of  ‘One-World’ Government proponents as a way to scare mankind into relinquishing control of their personal lives in favor of a centralized, socialist model. Most of the time, such warnings are cast-off as mere fodder for ‘Tin Foil Hat’ conspiracy nuts, or right-wing global warming ‘deniers’…a term used to compare global warming skeptics to holocaust deniers.

With the impending ‘Cap-n-Trade’ legislation, having passed the House (barely), and now headed to the Senate, it is time to take a look at the connection between One-World government and the Global Warming movement.

Whenever you look into any type of fraud in government, always start with the money trail. Al Gore, the spokesman for global warming, has seen his personal wealth rise from an estimated 2 million dollars upon leaving office to an estimated 100 million dollars (1). The ‘crisis’ of all mankind has been pretty good to Al Gore, the individual. It has been reported that Al Gore is a member of the ‘Club of Rome’ group (2). The Club Of Rome is an international ‘Think Tank’ that states on their web-site:  “Its essential mission is “to act as a global catalyst for change through the identification and analysis of the crucial problems facing humanity and the communication of such problems to the most important public and private decision makers as well as to the general public.(3)”

As you read the Club of Rome web-site information, it all sounds (purposefully) innocuous. However, when you look at their USA website (4) under the ‘Links’ section, something more insidious shows up…a link to The World Federalist Manifesto (5)…a very disturbing website. From the World Federalist Manifesto under the paragraph entitled The International Execuitve Branch: “A United Nations’ budget and management centralization would allow a better coordination of the activities and a reduction of costs of the 15 specialized agencies. The centralization of the UN system would create a de facto world government.”

I did some more researching and found something a bit eerie and even a little creepy: “In a report titled “The First Global Revolution” (1991) published by the Club of Rome, a globalist think tank, we find the following statement: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would more than fit the bill… All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”(6)

Can anyone guess who puts out the IPCC Climate Report that Al Gore and others rely so heavily on?? Yes…the United Nations (7).  How can anyone doubt the goal of the United Nations is to usurp control of the Governments of every country, including the most coveted – The United States? When our leaders sign U.N Treaties, they are handing over control to this power hungry, extremely corrupt body of foreigners who want nothing more than to control the resources, the economy – and the people – of the United States. Both parties in this country, Republican and Democrat, have signed U.N. treaties…and, at least in my mind, commit an act of treason every time they do.

So – what is Cap and Trade? In a nutshell, this government sponsored program allows companies to trade C02…a tree farm could ‘sell’ C02 credits to a coal-fired electricity producer…while the government, of course, gets a percentage of every sale. The government would assign a special number to every business. If you have a high number, and don’t purchase offsetting C02 credits, the government comes in and heavily fines your company. Where do these numbers come from? Government, of course, and your business will have to purchase the C02 special number from some new government agency.

What does this mean for a consumer? Well, EVERY product that you purchase will be seeing a price increase. Why? Because corporations DO NOT PAY TAXES…their customers do. Every company uses electricity, so every company will see a price increase. The goods and services in every industry will have this new surcharge added – and pass it along to the consumer. Every person will see a price increase in their own energy bills, their food, clothing, and everything else will have a corresponding price increase.

Who profits? Well, mostly Government – this is Obama’s SNEAKY way of paying for his huge new government. He promised not to increase taxes on anyone earning under $250k per year. Obama’s team runs around saying they will pay for their brave new world using a tax increase on ‘rich’ Americans. The problem: Most economists agree that even if you took every single penny from the ‘rich’ Americans – as described by the Obama team – it still doesn’t even come close to paying for the TRILLIONS of dollars he is spending. So where does all this new money come from? YOU and ME – in the form of Cap-and-Trade income to the government.

Who else profits? Those who invest in alternative energy companies that have inside information on government subsidies. Under Cap-and-Trade, the government pays BIG money to certain companies that qualify…companies that corrupt Senators and Congressman invest in, and then profit from laws THEY passed to fund these businesses. Al Gore himself admits to owning large stakes in such companies (8): “Here’s where it gets more interesting. The laws that Gore is referring to, of course, are those that would provide subsidies to and mandates for the alternative energy industry. Gore spotlights a number of these companies, including Smart Car; Amyris Biotechnologies; Altra Biofuels; Mascoma (cellulosic ethanol); Great Point Energy (biomass-to-gas and carbon capture technology); Altarock Energy (geothermal energy); Bloomenergy (fuel cells); Missole (solar technology); and Ausra (solar technology). As the companies; corporate logos flash on the screen, Gore states: “Here are just a few of the investments that I personally think make sense. I have a stake in these.”

These ‘Think Tank’ people invent a hoax, promote the hoax, whip up public sentiment through their media accomplices, claim a catastrophe is coming… then sell the “CURE”, and all retire handsomely in the Bahamas. This is Snake-Oil peddling on a global scale, and many people dearly believe in the snake-oil and even more so in those ‘saviors’ who produce the snake-oil.

Now that I have tied this entire HOAX together, and proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Global Warming movement is just a front for the New World Order, are there any gullible Liberals out there who still think I should be wearing a Tin Foil Hat? If so, then how about joining me in a new start-up, eco-friendly, green Tin-Foil Hat producing company…and we will all get rich and join the eco-fat cats down in the Bahamas.

Sources:

(1) http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=31398

(2) http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/06/05/1942343.htm

(3) http://www.clubofrome.org/eng/about/3/

(4) http://www.usacor.org/links/index.html

(5)  http://www.worldfederalistmanifesto.com

(6) http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=118_1228824580

(7) http://www.ipcc.ch/organization/organization.htm

(8) http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=31398

 I found an interesting article at: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html

The article is entitled: “Stagnating Temperatures – Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out.” This article offers some interesting insight into the European scientific community, which seems to be the most hysterical and alarmist.

One sentence is striking, an actual admission of sorts: “The Earth’s average temperatures have stopped climbing since the beginning of the millennium, and it even looks as though global warming could come to a standstill this year.” This is directly opposite of what we have been hearing for years; that more C02 equals higher temperatures. Yet, we have been dumping the same amount of C02, if not more, into the air for the last ten years, but the Earth is not warming…how can that be?

And another admission, “Perhaps we suggested too strongly in the past that the development will continue going up along a simple, straight line. In reality, phases of stagnation or even cooling are completely normal, says Latif.”

  He also added, “It is dangerous to cite individual weather-related occurrences, such as a drought in Mali or a hurricane, as proof positive that climate change is already fully underway.”

 However, what strikes me as most telling in this article backs up my long held belief that this whole hysteria is less about science, and more about money. The folks who are most hysterical seem to be those who would profit from – mostly – their own hysteria. Al Gore, for example, has invested in green technology companies that are competing for zillions of dollars of “stimulus” money, and if those companies make money – with the help of governmental regulations – Al Gore stands to personally benefit financially in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Is he advancing science to help all of mankind survive impending doom? Or is he “selling” pseudo-science to benefit Al Gore?

 What about climatologists whose very existence comes from generous government handouts in the form of “grants” that enables them to continue their “work.” Would they benefit from creating hysteria? Does the destruction of the Earth create enough hysteria? If you convince Prince Charles that the ice caps are going to melt and put his mummy’s palace under water – does that create enough hysteria? If you convince school children that all the polar bears are going to die – does that create enough hysteria?

 What if I was a noted geologist and I could scramble up some data and convince the mayor of Twin Falls that I needed $500,000.00 to study my theory that the whole city was about to slide into the canyon in 50 years – would that create enough hysteria that he would find a way to fund my research? Possibly. But what if I got a few hundred of my “science” pals to approach every mayor of every city along the Snake River and “sell” this idea. Pretty soon, it becomes big news. Some of the public might start to ask questions. A famous Hollywood star from Sun Valley gloms onto the idea and starts pitching it on the Oprah show. It gets talked about over and over and over until some of the public starts to believe in the idea. The mayors don’t want to be seen as the “do-nothing, anti-science” types and the other mayors believe it could happen, even though the theory is based on pretty flimsy, un-provable, unpredictable, and contradictory science. The debate goes on until one tiny little earthquake happens…the next day, I have a nice fat check for $500k.